All posts tagged “doors”

Test Ride: 2015 Ducati Scrambler: The exciting, retro-inspired motorcycle opens new doors for the performance-driven Italian superbike-maker

Test Ride: 2015 Ducati Scrambler

Originally introduced in 1962 exclusively in the United States, the Ducati Scrambler was a 250cc single-cylindar thumper on par with much of the enduro-style bikes coming out of Japan at the time. In 1968, its stateside popularity led to the launch……

Continue Reading…

Cool Hunting

Interview: Tricia MacKenzie of Inter Space Lab: Mapping neural patterns of artists to open doors toward better treatment for psychiatric disorders

Interview: Tricia MacKenzie of Inter Space Lab

Our contemporary creative world is peppered with scientific and technological influences—exhibitions that feature stylized data mapping, molecular gastronomy, Maker Faire’s everlasting dedication to the nerdy artist—it’s truly a tradition that traces at least as far back as da Vinci. But how often…

Continue Reading…

Cool Hunting

UX Tools: Implementing Doors Diagram

You’re reading UX Tools: Implementing Doors Diagram, originally posted on Designmodo. If you’ve enjoyed this post, be sure to follow on Twitter, Facebook, Google+!

UX Tools: Implementing Doors Diagram

After “How To Improve Your Website’s UX With Doors Diagram” you learned what Doors Diagram is and how to use it. This is the second part of the topic explaining why to use this design tool, covering this approach in more detail and showing some UX research while implementing Doors Diagram on Why is […]

Advertise here with BSA


How to Improve Website UX with Doors Diagram

You’re reading How to Improve Website UX with Doors Diagram, originally posted on Designmodo. If you’ve enjoyed this post, be sure to follow on Twitter, Facebook, Google+!

How to improve your website’s UX with Doors Diagram

Information visualization helps websites to increase retention, conversions and other metrics that may suffer from design flaws. Using the Doors Diagram to visualize a process of a user passing all the way from the starting point to the final goal could help us correct these user experience issues.  This diagram is much like a tool […]

Advertise here with BSA


Haunting website opens the doors to forgotten Japan

Browse the eerie, immersive environment of Japan’s ‘Ghost Island’ with the help of Google Street View.


Creative Bloq

Exploring the buttons, blast doors, and bunkers on both sides of the Cold War

Nuclear bunker controls (C) Justin Barton

Photographer Justin Barton has photographed the instruments and storehouses of nuclear death in the United States and the former Soviet Union, in a series titled “Atomic War in Details.” In a profile of the project from Wired, Barton says that he wants to “force people to look at the detail of these things they dismiss as history and irrelevant to our age.” As Wired points out, Barton’s work — which focuses on hardware like control panels and telephones — highlights the strange monotony of terror; something even Major Kong is familiar with.

Continue reading…

The Verge – All Posts

Are the doors closing on technological innovation and collaboration?

It seems like everyone has been watching the Samsung vs Apple lawsuit with bated breath and I’ve been no exception. It was interesting to see the case develop and also to see the various opinions of the verdict, including a stifling of innovation, whether juries should be giving verdicts on technological patents and whether such things can be patented in the first place.

Recently I was in a Microsoft 2010 training session and the Save As PDF version is now embedded into the software (and has been for a while), it started me thinking that some collaboration between Microsoft and Adobe must have taken place. Why was this innovation and collaboration a success whereas Samsung and Apple are at crossed purposes?

Image Source: Brainstorming Idea via Shutterstock

I realise I’m taking a rather simplistic view of that situation and when you delve into the situation with Microsoft and Adobe and the use of PDF software further you realise it wasn’t as straight-forward as hindsight might present. While the two heavyweights did finally reach an agreement in Microsoft using PDF technology with their release of Word 2007, it wasn’t without numerous discussions, questions on whether a royalty, or fee, should be paid to Adobe for this privilege and the threat of Microsoft starting to develop their own software

Even before this there were other technological battles, that have put software and hardware on the scrap heap. Does anyone remember what happened to Netscape? The first success story of the dotcom generation turned sour when Microsoft started shipping Internet Explorer with all its computers, again a rather simplified version but showing how dominance of one company in a marketplace can reduce consumer choice, it has taken several years for Firefox and later Chrome to significantly take a market share away from Explorer.

History is full of individuals that have innovated and created, Leonardo di Vinci for example, but it is also full of groups collaborating to work towards a common goal, the start of the Internet was a team of people working together towards a common goal. Relating it back to myself, while I find that I can work well and develop ideas as an individual, if I have someone to collaborate with and share ideas it becomes easier to develop my skills and, in turn, enhances my work. Many is the time when I’ve had a look at how to do something and there isn’t just one approach to get to the end solution. For me, this seems relatable to Samsung, did they use Apple’s idea or did they simple arrive to the same conclusion but by different means?

The Samsung and Apple wrangle feels somewhat more significant to me than the others I’ve mentioned. With the companies unable to reach a settlement and the verdict of the recent court case, to me feels like a precedent has been set. It seems there is a consensus out there that perhaps cases like this have no place in jury based courtroom, or that technology like this can’t be patented. The future cases brought in other countries and future battles against companies such as Google might lead to a loss of competition necessary to continue innovation and perhaps change the landscape of mobile devices, tablets and online design.

Image Source: Past? Now? Future Title via Shutterstock

What exactly will it mean for the future? Will the same verdict happen in courtrooms across the World? Will it mean that designers and developers are forced to focus on producing retina ready sites and applications that work on iPads, iPhones and Macs and ignore other devices? Will it mean that Android disappears? Will it stifle future creativity and innovation with everyone taking out patents for every single bit of technological advancement and close the doors on collaboration?

I don’t know what the future will bring and I’d be really interested to know what other designers/developers think.  One thing I do know is that I’ll be keeping a hold of my Samsung Galaxy Ace, just in case it becomes a collector’s item…..

Speckyboy Design Magazine